Most of an audit checklist is universal. What separates one factory from another is four things: the scope line on the certificate, the nature of the FDA registration, the limits of a test report, and whether a social-compliance audit exists at all. Those four are also where wording tends to get stretched.
Customer audits and third-party audits tend to work from the same list: legal entity, certificates, production and QC records, warehouse zoning, and facility and hygiene controls. We prepare against that list rather than assembling documents once an audit is booked — and that cuts both ways: if a factory only starts "getting the paperwork together" after you book, that is a signal worth writing down.
Read these together with the right-hand column. An audit that only asks "do you have the certificate" has not audited anything.
| Credential | Number and status | Proves | Does not prove |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | 749435 · Guardian Independent Certification (UK, UKAS 045) · issued 2024-08-20 · valid to 2027-08-17 | The quality system runs to the standard | Nothing about whether any given batch conforms |
| CGMP-ASEAN | 912/GCN-QLD · Drug Administration of Vietnam · renewal in progress, not yet issued | Production conditions and process control meet ASEAN GMP | Not a product registration, and no market access by itself |
| US FDA facility registration | FEI 3030839348 · registration period 2024-05 to 2026-05 · expired 2026-05-31 | The site was registered with FDA under MoCRA | Not an approval or a certification; FDA never approves a cosmetic formula |
All three numbers are searchable. To see originals, state the purpose and an inspection can be arranged during evaluation — scans are not published online, to prevent them being reused.
The scope printed on both the ISO 9001 and the CGMP certificate goes only as far as wet cosmetics. Pressed powders and dry-process work can be run on the lines, but they sit outside what the certificates cover.
When you show a certificate to a regulator or a large customer, they read the scope line. For a category outside it, the certificate offers no support — "can be made" and "in scope" are two different things.
So the question at audit is: what does your certificate scope say? A supplier who cannot answer that, or who says "it covers everything", is holding a piece of paper.
FDA never approves a cosmetic formula or product. Facility registration only puts the site address into FDA’s system as a filing under MoCRA — the registration itself says nothing about whether any product conforms.
There is a more practical point: it expires. This registration ran 2024-05 to 2026-05 and has lapsed. The accurate phrasing is "previously registered", not "holds FDA registration".
If a factory tells you it has "FDA certification", do not treat it as a translation slip. Ask one follow-up — is that facility registration or product approval? The answer tells you what you are dealing with.
Reports are issued and stamped by SAIGONSTC (Saigon Hi-Tech Analysis Centre, VILAS 943, ilac-MRA mutual recognition); the plant only submits the sample. That single fact defines its nature: the subject of the report is a sample, not a factory.
The original usually carries two lines — "sample taken by the client" and "sample name and details provided by the client". Those are not boilerplate disclaimers; they draw the boundary of effect at that one item on that one occasion.
So read three things rather than asking whether a report exists: the report date, whether the tested item is the one you are buying, and whether the test methods match your target market’s requirements.
BSCI and Sedex are not mandatory for cosmetics, but they are frequently a hard gate in European retailers’ supplier onboarding. They audit labour, working hours, safety and environment — not product quality.
We do not hold either. No BSCI, no Sedex, and no third-party social compliance report. Where a checklist includes them, we mark them "not held" rather than substituting another certificate.
This gets its own section because it is the easiest thing to blur. If you are running a European retailer’s private label, a gap here stops you at onboarding regardless of how well the formula and price were negotiated. Knowing two weeks earlier leaves time to change supplier or channel.
Every position you can walk to: the site, the emulsifying room, the packaging store, the warehouse, the raw-material store and the finished-goods store. You see production as it is running, not a staged sample room. The tour route does not pass through the offices, dormitories or canteen.
Three things are not open: formulations other clients are currently running, other clients’ packaging and artwork, and supplier labels on incoming materials. Not secrecy — that information belongs to other customers.
We have no edited promotional video: if you want to see the lines, see them on site rather than in a recording presented as live. You can ask for this directly when booking — request the running line, not the sample room. A factory comfortable with that usually has reason to be.

Write these down and work through them on the day. Every answer here has a reference point on this site, and the list works just as well on any other Vietnamese factory.
Three kinds of request get sent back on day 0 here: the category does not fit the lines, the volume sits below the MOQ, or the target market asks for something we cannot cover. That is our own practice.
Turn the same measure on any supplier you assess. If a factory answers "yes" to everything you ask, do not celebrate — most likely they did not understand, or do not intend to deliver. A factory willing to say "we cannot do this one" in the first conversation makes the remaining yeses worth something.
Our boundaries are set out on what we turn down, including why dry-process colour cosmetics are "makeable but out of scope".
The audit ends on the quotation. Without these fields the price is not comparable — two quotes that look 10% apart often differ on whether packaging is inside the price and whether the port is the same one.
| Field | Why it must be explicit |
|---|---|
| MOQ | kg or units, counted per SKU. Mixing the two is as good as omitting it. |
| Packaging | Inside the price or not; if not, how it is costed and who supplies it. |
| Port | Name the port, not "a Chinese port". |
| Document list | Itemised against the target market, not "standard documents". |
| Delivery milestones | State the start point, not "about X days". |
| Legal entity | Contract, certificates and customs all on the full registered name and tax code. |
These six are also the standard we hold our own quotations to, matching documents we issue.
Every number and date here comes from the plant’s written reply of 2026-10-28 and the original certificates, and can be checked line by line on the certifications page. Credential status changes over time; request the current version before you audit.
You get three answers back: whether it is feasible, the MOQ, and how sampling works. If it does not fit our lines, we say so in the first email instead of the third meeting.